[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:43:57 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:03:19 +0000
> From: Katevan Lomidze <catevan@gmx.us>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> All I am saying is that it is nice to add tree-sitter and lsp to Emacs, yet
> being too dependent on them in major modes is not.
We don't intend to be too dependent on it. In particular, the
original font-lock code will not disappear any time soon.
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/14
- Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/15
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/13
RE: Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Ketevan Lomidze, 2022/10/15
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Ketevan Lomidze, 2022/10/15
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter, Payas Relekar, 2022/10/15