[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch: first impression]
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [patch: first impression] |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:23:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "UB" == Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> On 17.10.2022 23:44, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> Thanks for testing, please try again with the latest master, I pushed
>> a fix in 5e77265523.
>> Or maybe try with 7bf17ceee8c2d, with patches 4a6ad6e18f and
>> 5e77265523 on top of it.
> Thanks, your latest commit works with commit 7bf17ceee8c2d.
> Some benchmarks.
> I cloned emacs master with hg
> | | repo size (GB) |
> | Git | 1.4 |
> | HG | 1.8 |
> I am using for this experiment master 0954689cb
> Steps:
> - hg src/xfns.c -r b9aff5fdb89092b68 (git reset (not sure hard or soft)
> - hg src/xterm.c -r b9aff5fdb89092b68
> - vc-dir (mark the two files)
> - vc-diff
> - delete hunks
> - run vc-next-action: time: 36 sec on my X1 Thinkpad 2017
> - do the same but run commit-patch-buffer using the perl script
> commit-patch
> time: 26 sec
> Conclusion, for most practical purpose the lisp implementation is
> enough. I just considered an extreme case.
I just realised that after finishing, the repository contains the files
xterm.c.orig
xfns.c.orig
I can easily get rid of them by running
hg purge (or git clean -fd)
But what is the purpose of leaving these files, is this by design or a
side effect of your implementation.
--
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the ban of Russia from SWIFT.
I support the EU membership of the Ukraine.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Re: [patch: first impression], (continued)
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/17
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/17
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/17
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/17
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/17
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression],
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2022/10/18
- Re: [patch: first impression], Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2022/10/18