|
| From: | Stefan Kangas |
| Subject: | Re: feature/eglot-texi-manual 4725c123f3 2/5: ; eglot.texi: Fix typos and minor inconsistenciesfeature/eglot-texi-manual 4725c123f3 2/5: ; eglot.texi: Fix typos and minor inconsistencies |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:24:58 -0700 |
Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
> >> -languages which are only supported by the @code{etags} backend.
> >> +languages that are only supported by the @code{etags} backend.
>
> Eli> And this one? What's wrong with using "which" in that case?
>
> Nothing, except that there are some grammarians who believe that there
> is an iron-clad infallible rule which governs when to use 'which'
> versus 'that', which most of us donʼt care about [1] (and Iʼve yet to
> see an example where using the 'wrong' one was unclear).
I generally try to follow the most authoritative recommendations I can
find, but if there is a particular reason to be more progressive here,
then please go for it.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |