Re: Understanding end-of-defun

[Stefan Monnier]

> Presumably this makes us go to the next arg’h begining-of-defun, and goes to
> the end of that defun. However, what if beginning-of-defun-raw couldn’t find
> any defun beyond point, didn’t move point, and returned nil? At that point
> calling end-of-defun-function breaks the assumption that we only call it
> when point is at the beginning of a defun. Am I missing something?

No, you're quite right.  We should double check that
`beginning-of-defun-raw` was successful (and do something else if not).


        Stefan