|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages |
Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2022 08:50:08 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The reason why I think shorthands don't address that problem is pretty > simple, according to me again: The underlying one obarray can only > contain one name per symbol at a time. So, whatever name lands in the I thought CL packages had the same problem: you can't (globally) have two packages with the same name. Stefan "Trying hard not to get pulled into this discussion"
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |