[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2023 11:08:37 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 09:40:09 +0100
>
> On Jan 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Right. This doesn't work for pipes, so I intend to introduce a new
> > function that does fsync on the descriptor via which we write to the
> > sub-process, and call it there instead of process-send-eof. Does this
> > make sense?
>
> You will probably get EINVAL.
And the stuff will not be flushed? Is there a better way of doing
that for pipe file descriptors?
- Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/14
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Jim Porter, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Andreas Schwab, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Andreas Schwab, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Andreas Schwab, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15