Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send

[Andreas Schwab]

On Jan 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
>> Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 09:40:09 +0100
>> 
>> On Jan 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> 
>> > Right.  This doesn't work for pipes, so I intend to introduce a new
>> > function that does fsync on the descriptor via which we write to the
>> > sub-process, and call it there instead of process-send-eof.  Does this
>> > make sense?
>> 
>> You will probably get EINVAL.
>
> And the stuff will not be flushed?

There is nothing to flush.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."