[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2023 09:40:09 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Jan 15 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Right. This doesn't work for pipes, so I intend to introduce a new
> function that does fsync on the descriptor via which we write to the
> sub-process, and call it there instead of process-send-eof. Does this
> make sense?
You will probably get EINVAL.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
- Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/14
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Jim Porter, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Andreas Schwab, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Andreas Schwab, 2023/01/15
- Re: Sending EOF to process as part of comint-simple-send, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/15