[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated fil
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem) |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:47:43 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:31:23 -0800
> Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
>
> On 2/24/2023 10:37 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:48:02 -0800
> >> Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> I think this only occurs when starting the Emacs server in a batch-mode
> >> Emacs process and then starting a client via "emacsclient -c". I see the
> >> segfault when running any of the tests in test/lisp/server-tests.el that
> >> create a frame (e.g. 'server-tests/server-start/stop-prompt-with-client').
> >>
> >> This also only seems to occur if the first face that
> >> 'face-set-after-frame-default' passes to 'internal-merge-in-global-face'
> >> is the default face.
> >
> > Thanks. Does the patch below give good results?
>
> Thanks, that fixes it for me.
Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch.
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), (continued)
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Po Lu, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Alan Mackenzie, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/26
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/26
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/27
- Re: server.el test failures, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/27
- Re: server.el test failures, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/27
- Re: server.el test failures, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/27
- Re: server.el test failures, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/27
- Re: server.el test failures, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/28
- Re: server.el test failures, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/28
- Re: server.el test failures, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/28