[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2023 14:06:08 +0000 |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> FWIW i agree with you on all points.
>
> It's important for packages to be allowed to keep the names the developers
> baptized them with.
Important in what sense? There have frequently been authors that have
changed the names of their packages when this was suggested to them, so
it doesn't like it was important for them. People are making a bigger
deal out of quirky names than it should be.
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, (continued)
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/11
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/11
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Jim Porter, 2023/05/12
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/05/13
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Susam Pal, 2023/05/13
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Richard Stallman, 2023/05/15
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, João Távora, 2023/05/17
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, João Távora, 2023/05/17
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/05/17
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil, Richard Stallman, 2023/05/13
- Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil), Jim Porter, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Jim Porter, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Jim Porter, 2023/05/18
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Akib Azmain Turja, 2023/05/19
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/05/20