Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'denote-rename-buffer' extension

[Protesilaos Stavrou]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 11:05:50 +0000
>
> Ruijie Yu via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> writes:

> [... 20 lines elided]

>> I'm curious, should GNU elpa packages be considered part of Emacs or
>> not?  I have previously contributed to pyim, a GNU elpa package, whose
>> maintainer asked me whether I had FSF CA before including my proposed
>> changes, and whose package header says it is part of Emacs.
>
> I believe this is a mistake, the package is part of the GNU ELPA
> repository, where all packages are regarded to be part of GNU Emacs.  It
> might be that Prot used a template to generate this file, and that the
> template defaulted to "... is not a part ...".

I didn't know this.  To my mind, the modus-themes are "part of Emacs".
The rest have copyright assigned to the FSF and, as such, "could be part
of Emacs".

I am happy to change this in all my packages.

-- 
Protesilaos Stavrou
https://protesilaos.com