emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'deno


From: Ruijie Yu
Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'denote-rename-buffer' extension
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 16:39:47 +0800
User-agent: mu4e 1.9.22; emacs 30.0.50

ELPA Syncer <elpasync@gnu.org> writes:

> diff --git a/denote-rename-buffer.el b/denote-rename-buffer.el
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..3582f33e9b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/denote-rename-buffer.el
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +;;; denote-rename-buffer.el --- Rename Denote buffers to be shorter and 
> easier to read -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
> +
> +;; Copyright (C) 2023  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> +;; Author: Protesilaos Stavrou <info@protesilaos.com>
> +;; Maintainer: Denote Development <~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht>
> +;; URL: https://git.sr.ht/~protesilaos/denote
> +;; Mailing-List: https://lists.sr.ht/~protesilaos/denote
> +
> +;; This file is NOT part of GNU Emacs.

I'm curious, should GNU elpa packages be considered part of Emacs or
not?  I have previously contributed to pyim, a GNU elpa package, whose
maintainer asked me whether I had FSF CA before including my proposed
changes, and whose package header says it is part of Emacs.

-- 
Best,


RY



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]