[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs design and architecture
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs design and architecture |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:43:15 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Immanuel Litzroth <immanuel.litzroth@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't understand this remark. When you talk about "the language used
> to implement emacs" are you talking about C or elisp?
C, of course.
> What is the LibreOffice extension language that is "almost the same"?
> Can you provide a link?
LibreOffice is written in C++. And it is programmable, by virtue of its
nature as a computer program.
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, (continued)
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/16
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/09/16
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Po Lu, 2023/09/16
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/16
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Po Lu, 2023/09/16
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Immanuel Litzroth, 2023/09/17
- Re: Emacs design and architecture,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/17
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Po Lu, 2023/09/17
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/18
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Po Lu, 2023/09/18
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/18
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/20
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/20
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/17
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, chad, 2023/09/19
- Re: Emacs design and architecture, Richard Stallman, 2023/09/21