[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Oct 2023 00:43:45 -0700 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Striving for perfect consistency in color names between systems is a
>> pointless exercise, for X servers are given a blank check to modify
>> local colors as they see fit, generally in a crude attempt at color
>> calibration for the system's monitor.
I'm not quite following. Are you referencing aesthetic differences or
older X server behaviors? Could you clarify the reason behind
maintaining this difference with X.Org?
> I agree. I think we should revert that commit,
While I'm not entirely clear on the details, I won't oppose that.
I'm less inclined to dive deep into discussions about older X server
intricacies.
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Po Lu, 2023/10/14
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/15
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Stefan Kangas, 2023/10/15
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Po Lu, 2023/10/15
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Stefan Kangas, 2023/10/16
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Po Lu, 2023/10/16
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Stefan Kangas, 2023/10/17
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Po Lu, 2023/10/17
- Re: master 11f10dc0d0b: Update etc/rgb.txt from X.Org upstream, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/17