[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:07:29 -0800 |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Though, on the face of things, I don't think I understand why
> `play-sound` should block. Is there a good reason for that, or is it
> just an implementation accident? And are there any important reasons
> to preserve its blocking behavior?
I'm answering myself here:
Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:
> It would be better if all sound implementations where asynchronous and
> quittable.
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3351#19
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, (continued)
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Daniel Semyonov, 2024/01/03
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/03
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Daniel Semyonov, 2024/01/04
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/05
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Daniel Semyonov, 2024/01/06
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/06
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, No Wayman, 2024/01/06
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, No Wayman, 2024/01/07
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/05
Re: Vendoring code in a (Non?)GNU ELPA package, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/03