Re: Possible minibuffer completion enhancements

[Stefan Kangas]

Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:

> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:
>>
>>> In general, I'm happy to upstream anything that seems useful/desirable
>>> in my working branch, even if I haven't mentioned it here specifically.
>>
>> Thanks.  Could I ask that you send patches to us for the changes you
>> think might be generally useful?
>
> Sure, I've just sent one in Bug#68508.

Thank you.  I also saw some doc fixes that might be worth considering,
and maybe there's more?

It takes extra work to pick out changes in an external branch where your
changes are mixed in with the ones from the official tree.  So the more
you can send, the more we are likely to integrate, I think.

> Do you feel that any of the minibuffer commands I suggested should be
> sent for review as well?

I don't use the default completion, but based on their descriptions I
don't see why we shouldn't want to consider all of them.

If the changes are orthogonal, it might make sense with one bug report
per patch, otherwise it might make more sense with a feature branch.

It really is whichever makes it easier to test and review the changes,
and probably you are in a the best position to say what you think about
that.  Then we'll take it from there.