Re: Possible minibuffer completion enhancements

[Stefan Kangas]

Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com> writes:

> Yeah, that makes sense.  There's a small bugfix that I'll try to send
> later today, and I'll check the doc fixes to see if they're relevant.

Sounds good.  Thanks in advance for your contributions.

> I think a feature branch could be nice.  The changes are conceptually
> orthogonal in the sense that each enhancement can be useful by itself,
> but the code changes are not separated as some of them touch the same
> areas of minibuffer.el.
>
> I can pick the relevant changes and create a tidy feature branch with
> just these new minibuffer commands added on top of master, if that helps.

That sounds like a good way to experiment with this feature, yes.