[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections
From: |
T.V Raman |
Subject: |
Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:17:44 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
All very good points, Kartik!
Some related thoughts below:
1. I think we should for now treat prose-rewriting vs code-rewriting as
separate flows -- but that said, limit our types of "flows"
to 2. More might emerge over time, but it's too early.
2. Multi-step flows with LLMs are still early -- or feel early to me; I
think that for now, we should just have human-in-the-loop at each
step, but then leverage the power of Emacs to help the user stay
efficient in the human-in-the-loop step, start with simple things
like putting point and mark in the right place, populate Emacs
completions with the right choices etc.
--
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, (continued)
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, T.V Raman, 2024/01/22
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, Andrew Hyatt, 2024/01/22
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, T.V Raman, 2024/01/22
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/22
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, Andrew Hyatt, 2024/01/22
Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, João Távora, 2024/01/22
Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2024/01/23
Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, contact, 2024/01/23
- Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections,
T.V Raman <=
Re: LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, Andrew Hyatt, 2024/01/24
LLM Experiments, Part 1: Corrections, Psionic K, 2024/01/22