[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond* vs pcase
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: cond* vs pcase |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Feb 2024 22:20:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> > I am not sure if Alfred meant that in his first message, perhaps he
> did, but
> > Drew seems to be more in line with that thinking. At least I
> understand him so.
> >
> > I'm not alluding to any specific design principle, the core issue at
> > hand is communicating with the person reading the code.
>
> Yes, that is how I understand you; but I'll answer same as to Drew; I don't
> agree that this is the best way of expressing the intention.
>
> Both pcase and cl-case in this particular simple context I have posted,
> express
> the intention equally well. [...]
>
> We disagree to the point that there cannot be any agreement on the
> topic
Than lets agree to disagree and move on.
Anyway, thank you for your input!
Best regards
/arthur
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Yuri Khan, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/08
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase,
Arthur Miller <=
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/06
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/06
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Thierry Volpiatto, 2024/02/06
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/06
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Barry Fishman, 2024/02/07
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/07