[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code for cond*
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Code for cond* |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2024 11:42:56 -0500 |
> On a slightly different topic, when will cond* be added/commited to
> GNU Emacs? Seeing that how cond* works, and documentation has
> slightly materialized, it would be good to get some milage.
FWIW, I'm opposed to adding it without first unifying the Pcase and
`match*` pattern languages (including making sure that third party
packages which define their own patterns don't need to define them
separately for `pcase` and for `match*`).
[ It's trivial to do by making `match*` reuse the Pcase machinery, so
there is no serious obstacle for that. ]
Would you like to do so?
- Re: Code for cond*, (continued)
Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/22
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/23
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/25
- Re: Code for cond*,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/02/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/25
Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/25
Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/26
Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/22