[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:05:13 +0000 |
Hello, Stefan and Stefan.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 15:39:09 -0500, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> > A few years ago, Daniel suggested:
> >> Likewise, for windmove, we can bind C-x 4 {left, right, up, down} and DWIM
> >> for people automatically, enabled by default.
> >
> > AFAICT we still don't actually provide any keybindings for the windmove
> > commands by default. Did I miss a controversy about that, or did it
> > just fall through the cracks?
> FWIW, I don't remember any controversy either, so my guess is that it
> just fell through the cracks.
I would be against using C-x 4 <arrow keys> or C-x 5 <arrow-keys> for
windmove (or anything else) by default. Key sequences with arrow keys
are too few, and too precious, to use for anything not critically
important.
windmove is not critically important. Either it isn't used at all by a
user (likely most users), or it is used all the time (by a small number
of users). In the latter case, the user will already have bound the
commands to key sequences, since they are not useful called from M-x.
It wasn't so long ago that we were removing default key bindings so as
to free them up for other uses. I don't think there's any reason to
reverse that policy for windmove. It just isn't important enough.
There will be users who've bound these key bindings for their own uses.
Let's not mess these users around.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/21
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/21
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, chad, 2024/06/23
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/23