[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Dec 2006 23:57:03 +1300 |
> > t-mouse.el was added in 2006 so it is correct.
>
> It can't be correct. See my thread in emacs-devel.
> If Rubini and Zimmermann have signed assignments, their names should
> not appear as copyright holders. If they haven't, the file should not
> be in Emacs, AFAIU.
And I thought we said that CC mode was added to Emacs in 1992, yet e.g
;;; cc-langs.el --- language specific settings for CC Mode
;; Copyright (C) 1985, 1987, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
;; 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software
;; Foundation, Inc.
i.e the years before 1992 are still in the header
Q. to RMS: What *should* the header for t-mouse.el look like?
Currently:
;; Copyright (C) 1994,1995 Alessandro Rubini <address@hidden>
;; parts are by Ian T Zimmermann <address@hidden>, 1995,1998
;; Copyright (C) 2006
;; Free Software Foundation, Inc.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/04
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10