[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace
From: |
Sascha Ottolski |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:09:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 00:59:12 schrieb Anand Avati:
> > now, another astonishing observation: if I enable the io-cache, it
> > has a good effect for apache1 (almost doubles the requests/second),
> > but almost none for apache2, nginx and lighttpd.
> >
> > could this help to understand more about the performance
> > differences?
>
> io-cache should have helped all of them.
that's why I find it amazing.
> all these requests to the FS
> are read-only right?
exactly, and the test was with 5000 random requests of the same set of
only ~10 static URLs/files, so all files should be in the cache.
Cheers, Sascha
- [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Anand Avati, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace,
Sascha Ottolski <=
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Anand Avati, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Anand Avati, 2008/01/19
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Angel, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Gluster-devel] webservers vs. glusterfs vs. namespace, Sascha Ottolski, 2008/01/21