[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:13:48 +0100 |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00:20AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 12/20/10 09:58, strk wrote:
>
> > Great, how to make that run shorter ?
> > What about adding a "Critical" severity above Security ?
>
> What's the difference between Critical and Important ? Most bugs
> should be marked as Normal if anything else is to have any meaning.
Important is something users will be pretty disappointed about.
Critical doesn't let you develop (say: can't build or crashes at startup)
1. Wish
2. Minor
3. Normal
4. Important
5. Blocker (release blocker)
6. Security (memory error)
7. Critical (can't contribute anymore w/out being fixed)
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
- [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity,
strk <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, John Gilmore, 2010/12/20
[Gnash-dev] Re: Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2010/12/20