[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity

From: strk
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:19:46 +0100

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:32:22AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 12/20/10 10:13, strk wrote:
> > Important is something users will be pretty disappointed about.
> > Critical doesn't let you develop (say: can't build or crashes at startup)
>   But that would be a Blocker then...

Sure, anything from Blocker and above would be also blocker ...

> I think adding a Critical field is
> unnecessary. My definition of Blocker matches your definition of Critical.

so you consider Security more severe than a bug blocking development ?

 1. Wish
 2. Minor
 3. Normal
 4. Important
 5. Blocker 
 6. Security 


  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]