gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees


From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:34:08 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:31PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>    A fixed path for revision libraries is fine.   It should 
>    _not_ have a mechanism for invoking a script to compute the path.
>    Miles' requirements can be satisfied in cleaner ways.

Which are?  As described so far, a fixed path is certainly _not_ sufficient.

[I have this sinking feeling that the answer's going to be something like
`Buy a bigger disk!  Buy a faster computer!']

-Miles
-- 
97% of everything is grunge




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]