[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:33:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:42:10PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
>
> > I think that the build system is generally a better place to
> > solve 'make dist'.
>
>
> Why?
>
> Why do we want two different mechanisms both of which purport to
> identify "the subset of this tree which is source?"
>
> Both `make dist' and revision control need to know that subset: why
> should I have to specify it _twice_?
Here's a random observation for you:
I use automake and tla with several "complex" projects. For these
trees, the set of files which automake considers source (for the
purpose of packing into distributed tarballs, which I make releases
from), and the set of files which tla considers source, are disjoint
in both directions.
This is deliberate.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Tom Lord, 2003/11/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unmatched files, Colin Walters, 2003/11/17