[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch

From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] grokking arch
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:23:21 -0800 (PST)

    > From: Robin Green <address@hidden>

    > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 05:16:25PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
    > > BTW, you mentioned that your presentation of this was thwarted because
    > > of some BK licensing issue.   Are we to infer from this that BK is
    > > used internally at RH?

    > Funny, I would have thought that in that case the BitKeeper license could
    > _at most_ prohibit contributing slides such as these to the arch project
    > (including presumably this mailing list), rather than prohibit using the
    > slides internally.

    > How can Bitmover restrict you from talking about alternatives to Bitkeeper
    > *internally*?

    > I'm obviously misunderstanding what's going on here...

Seconded.   Other than the general level of paranoia that LM's
attitude may have induced.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]