gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] push-mirror CLI


From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] push-mirror CLI
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)


Say, Andrew -- is this going to wind up in the mbox for the
as-yet-unqualified bug?  If not --- that's a feature request (i.e.,
thread-tracking on [BUG] messages.)

-t



    > X-IUP-Tag1: emfe1.cc.iup.edu
    > X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's Find_Attachments
    > Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 17:22:46 -0400
    > Cc: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
    > Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden, Tom Lord <address@hidden>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    > Content-Disposition: inline
    > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
    > From: Jason McCarty <address@hidden>
    > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.42inc.com
    > X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mail 1166; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
    > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_RFCI,
    >   RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63
    > X-42email-MailScanner-Information: Please contact 
http://www.42inc.com/support.html for more information.
    > X-42email-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    > X-UIDL: 678f4e9de283c06b9e5421dbe3077332
    > 
    > 
    > Tom Lord wrote:
    > > 
    > > 
    > > push-mirror should work correctly (use default mirror or default
    > > archive and mirror) if only a `limit' argument is provided --- there
    > > is no syntactic ambiguity in that case.
    > 
    > Hmm, I had a bug on savannah a long time ago about this (#4953). I have
    > a patch that fixes it:
    >   address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3--patch-1
    > although you may not like the implementation, and I conflated it with
    > reverting help text changes I didn't like ;-)  I can split it up if you
    > want.
    > 
    > -- 
    > Jason McCarty <address@hidden>
    > 
    > 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]