[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] push-mirror CLI
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] push-mirror CLI |
Date: |
Tue, 11 May 2004 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT) |
Say, Andrew -- is this going to wind up in the mbox for the
as-yet-unqualified bug? If not --- that's a feature request (i.e.,
thread-tracking on [BUG] messages.)
-t
> X-IUP-Tag1: emfe1.cc.iup.edu
> X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's Find_Attachments
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 17:22:46 -0400
> Cc: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
> Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden, Tom Lord <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
> From: Jason McCarty <address@hidden>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.42inc.com
> X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mail 1166; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_RFCI,
> RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63
> X-42email-MailScanner-Information: Please contact
http://www.42inc.com/support.html for more information.
> X-42email-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-UIDL: 678f4e9de283c06b9e5421dbe3077332
>
>
> Tom Lord wrote:
> >
> >
> > push-mirror should work correctly (use default mirror or default
> > archive and mirror) if only a `limit' argument is provided --- there
> > is no syntactic ambiguity in that case.
>
> Hmm, I had a bug on savannah a long time ago about this (#4953). I have
> a patch that fixes it:
> address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3--patch-1
> although you may not like the implementation, and I conflated it with
> reverting help text changes I didn't like ;-) I can split it up if you
> want.
>
> --
> Jason McCarty <address@hidden>
>
>