[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input
20 May 2004 11:50:33 +0900
Aaron Bentley <address@hidden> writes:
> Yeah, it's ugly. Valid revision names are always considered to be
> revisions, but I believe it's possible to express any file path so that
> it's not a valid revision. For example, a directory named
> "address@hidden/cat--branch--1.0--patch-3" could be referred to as
> "./address@hidden/cat--branch--1.0--patch-3", which isn't valid.
Yeah; I would be perfectly happy if using directory names required a
magic syntax. E.g., for doing a delta against the directory FOO,
something really magic like `dir:FOO' (which has the advantage that it's
clearly not a normal filename), or `./FOO' (which is somewhat compatible
-- we'd probably want to accept just `.' as a special case for the
Of course there's always that annoying backward compatibility thing...
`Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said.
`All the past could be forgiven.' [NYT]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input, Colin Walters, 2004/05/20