[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2004 19:11:54 -0400 |
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 09:34, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Unfortunately, you've introduced an ambiguity. It used to be that valid
> revision names were always treated as revisions by delta. Now, valid
> revision names are not treated as revisions if there is a directory in
> the cwd with that name.
True...
> Thus, "tla delta tla--mainline--1.3--patch-9
> address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3" is an ambigious statement; do the
> arguments refer to directories or to revision names? (And sadly,
> "tla--mainline--1.3--patch-9" is the default directory name produced by
> tla get)
This is pretty easy to fix - just add a check for a valid revision
before the dir test. It's kind of a special case for delta.
> I've merged your patches into my errors branch,
Er, I wish you hadn't done that, at least without asking me - you've
broken the star-shaped configuration.
> and added the ability
> for arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input to determine a revision from a
> version:
> address@hidden/tlasrc--errors--3--patch-15
Do you need to update your mirror? I only see patch-12.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input, Colin Walters, 2004/05/20