[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes

From: Robert Widhopf-Fenk
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] "tla commit" vs. changes
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:58:30 +0200

On Monday, May 24, 2004 at 13:35:19, James Blackwell wrote:
> James Blackwell wrote:
> >> Yeah, I say we take a step back, and instead of covering the
> >> trivial mistakes up, we go back to square one and teach them the
> >> purpose of "what-changed"
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> > Well go ahead and teach them, probably you have time or the
> > maybe the question will not rise anymore.  But, whenever one
> > asks that dumb question again, we will refer to you as as
> > teacher :c)
> When I said "we" I was referring to the community of arch
> developers. To whom do you refer when you say "we?"

WE, the arch newbies wondering about empty commits and their
use and asking the dump question in the first place.  ;c)

Let's close this thread here and focus on the feature plan ...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]