[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:00:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 04:47:21PM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Brian:
> % tla get B
> * getting B-1
> % cd B-1
> % tla star-merge A
> * star merging A-1
>
> Albert:
> % tla get A
> * getting A-1
> % cd A-1
> % tla star-merge B
> * star merging B-1
>
> Brian:
> % tla commit -s "merged latest A"
>
> Albert:
> % tla commit -s "merged latest B"
I did all this, or I think I did, anyway:
* Imported starmerge--a--0 (branch A) base-0, a file
with one line.
* Tagged starmerge--b--0 (branch B) base-0, tag of branch A.
* Committed branch A patch-1, adding a line after.
* Committed branch B patch-1, adding a line before.
* Star-merged B (patch-1) into A (patch-1).
* Star-merged A (patch-1) into B (patch-1).
* Committed both (patch-2 for each).
At this point,
* Star-merge B into A works (but that's a false positive due
to too little input data; it fuzzies and does it wrong).
* Star-merge A into B fails due to conflict.
* Star-merge either using --three-way works perfectly.
Interestingly, even though --three-way reports adding two patch logs
and modifying the file (*not* a conflict), it only adds one patch log
and doesn't make any changes to the file. Essentially, the merge
becomes a no-op (as one would expect).
Is the three-way behaviour helpful at all in improving the normal
behaviour? Is it only working due to minimal input data?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Aaron Bentley, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Tom Lord, 2004/09/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Matthieu Moy, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Aaron Bentley, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded,
Adrian Irving-Beer <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, David Allouche, 2004/09/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Jan Hudec, 2004/09/11
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, David Allouche, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Tom Lord, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Star-merge Fatally Wounded, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/09/11