[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin
|
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin |
|
Date: |
Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:22:03 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Tom Browder" <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Does arch offer or plan to offer those three features (CVS rtag equivalent,
> binary diff, CVSROOT equivalent)?
tla's tag doesn't require a working tree. My guess is it's as close
to CVS's rtag as is reasonably possible in Arch. Arch doesn't yet
have a binary diff. tla does have a default archive, and I'd guess
that's equivalent to CVSROOT.