Thomas Lord <address@hidden> writes:
And, in the news: yes, I do actually plan to start releasing
code for Arch 2.0, within some small number of days. There
won't be enough there, initially, to migrate to but, for what
it's worth, that's coming up and is probably relevant to the I.T.
questions.
So what sort of design did you end up with? My impression from before
is that it was roughly going to be sort of a mix of a vaguely git-ish
low-level with a more arch-ish user layer on top of it?
[That would be cool ... I'm a big fan of git's basic design, and the
fact that every operation is mind-blowingly fast is a rather nice change
from arch (where everything is .... slow), but when I've tried to set it
up to my own preferences, I could never quite get it to do the right
thing... I think git is a great advance, but there's a lot that still
needs to be worked out.]