[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:57:10 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) |
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Collecting copyright assignments is trivial business,
Unfortunately, it is not. The basic mechanics of it are trivial, sure:
collect autographs. The details matter a lot though.
Recall that it wouldn't have been simply the FSF office doing
this, the way they do for GCC: it would have been *me* collecting
those papers. So, I'd have been party to all those contracts.
I might have been liable if someone lied or got wrong their rights
to assign work to me. For my protection I would have to pay rent
to securely archive those assignments (forever, essentially).
Assignments aren't a game. They have to be handled with great
care and, even if the mechanics of them are simple, that "great
care" is expensive.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Thomas Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Andy Tai, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/17
Message not available
Message not available