[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:19:37 +0100 (CET) |
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
There's no Stephen J. Turnbull General Public License there.
The whole point was that you could make one, not that there was one.
> What did I win?
Troll-of-the-Month Award. I should have known better than to play.
As usual, when you no longer have any rational arguments you resort to
ad hominem attacks.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Andy Tai, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/17
Message not available
Message not available