[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation
From: |
Jaromil |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:41:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Jaro Mail <https://www.dyne.org/software/jaromail> |
dear Ali,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote:
> > I do read code and after reading Uruk's script to update I'd
> > rather not endorse it based on the quality of the code, which I
> > hope will be improved. I guess Uruk would be better off without
> > any update, or adopting amprolla to distribute its packages as
> > overlay to Trisquel's repository.
> Can you tell me What are the problems in the script??
I think you should at least make a sha256 checksum of all the scripts
you are running and the assets you are installing.
More In general I believe hashing should be used to verify that the
changes applied are those really intended.
I really hope amprolla is of good use for you, yet it is still ALPHA
stage, entering beta soon after some work in progress this month.
ciao
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, (continued)
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation,
Jaromil <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Joshua Gay, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, André Silva, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28