[GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1262331] (inactive Linux distributions)

[Therese Godefroy via RT]

Hello,

Although this ticket only makes unsupported statements, the OP may have a point.

Should a distro that hasn't been maintained for several years be listed in 
free-distros.html, especially if it is based on a major distro which itself 
isn't maintained anymore? I am thinking of Blag, based on Fedora 10 (2010).

Conversely, if unmaintained distros are listed, is there any good reason not to 
list a new one, which clearly is actively maintained (Uruk)?  

Best regards,
Thérèse


Le Dim 31 Déc 2017 15:50:11, address@hidden a écrit :
> 
> BLAG is inactive
> 
> Dragora GNU Linux-Libre is inactive
> 
> Dynebolic is inactive
> 
> Musix is inactive
> 
> happy a new year
>