[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:00:10 -0400 |
What do you think? I would volunteer to formulate in a few days a new
version taking the discussion into account.
How is this any different than what we have on our web pages already?
I've asked this now on several occasions, and nobody seems able to
answer this simple question.
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, (continued)
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Mark Wielaard, 2019/10/29
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/31
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Florian Weimer, 2019/10/31
- Re: address@hidden is premoderated, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/10/29
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/10/26
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/10/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/10/31
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/10/31
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Samuel Thibault, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/10/28
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ruben Safir, 2019/10/28