Re: address@hidden is premoderated

[Dmitry Alexandrov]

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:21 AM Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard <mjw@gnu.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:22:48AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> >> Iʼd like to report that my message number d0eidcqu.321942@gmail.com 
>> >> (below), sent a day ago to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org (which I am 
>> >> subscribed on and usually have no problems to post to), had not landed to 
>> >> the archive [0] for unknown reason — I did not get any failure 
>> >> notification.
>> >
>> > The list is [pre]moderated, simply wait till a moderator accepts or 
>> > rejects your messages.
>>
>> Funny.  Either the moderators were so efficient earlier so I never noticed 
>> that, or thatʼs a fairly recent policy, that was introduced secretly (I do 
>> not see any announcement).  May I ask, which it is?
>
> I placed the list on moderation to help with cooling down heated discussions.

Thank you for clarification.

I (and, I dare suppose, others too) will appreciate, if the next radical change 
in policy (in either direction) will be publicly announced to prevent 
misinterpretations.

> It is entirely within the normal bounds of list management to use moderation.

(Un)fortunately, I am not familiar with the list management within these 
bounds, so could you enlighen me, how should I get known, that my letter is 
rejected by a censor?  Will I get a notification with the reason explained?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature