[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnucap-devel] git or Fossil?

From: John Griessen
Subject: Re: [Gnucap-devel] git or Fossil?
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 09:31:52 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5

On 04/28/2013 09:24 AM, John Griessen wrote:
On 04/28/2013 08:43 AM, John Griessen wrote:
On 04/24/2013 10:28 PM, al davis wrote:
It looks like "git" is the choice,
but I invite other opinions.

One more thing:

From a list of ten git negatives:

7. Unsafe version control

The fundamental promise of any version control system is this: “Once you put 
your precious source code
in here, it’s safe. You can make any changes you like, and you can always get 
it back”.
Git breaks this promise. Several ways a committer can irrevocably destroy the 
contents of a repository:

    git add . / … / git push -f origin master
    git push origin +master
    git rebase -i <some commit that has already been pushed and worked from> / 
git push

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]