[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix
From: |
Portela Fernand |
Subject: |
RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:34:14 +0100 |
I wrote:
> I guess something got forgotten in D509. The question is, since the
> pattern was disabled due to the bug, is it worth re-enabling it ?
Apparently, yes. If I'm not mistaken, it causes following breakage :
./regress.sh . trevorb.tst
160 FAILED: Correct '1 ..*', got '0'
./regress.sh . trevor.tst
360 FAILED: Correct '(2|3) J9', got '1 E9'
I prefer to know that we still have these problems.
And
./regress.sh . strategy3.tst
105 PASSED
If it's correct (I haven't checked carefully), then it looks very good to
me.
/nando
- [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/10
- RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix,
Portela Fernand <=
- [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, bump, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/30
RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/11