[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:27:45 +0100 (CET) |
I wrote:
> There is also a bug in examine_position with regards to the caching.
> (Would show up if a gtp_dragon_data or owl_attack etc. is followed by a
> genmove.)
> I don't see why examine_position should have the color parameter at all,
> btw.
> (Patch not yet tested. It might also slow down regressions.)
I'd say we don't use the patch I posted then. It's ugly, and I think we
want the proper solution anyway.
Arend
- [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/10
- RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/10
- [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, bump, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix,
Arend Bayer <=
RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/11
RE: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/15