[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)

From: Andreas Tille
Subject: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:42:07 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:17:31PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Can you point me to the Debian file which maps mimetypes to
> file extensions ?
> Oh, wait, there is /etc/mime.types.

> Hm, it doesn't have image/x-bmp ...
> Let's look at mime_type2file_extension.conf ...
> Ha ! There it is !
> Andreas, this file is there for a reason - it maps x-bmp to
> .bmp which otherwise won't always work on Debian.

So you try to fix a bug in mime-support by advising people to install
gnumed-client???  And I'm actually not sure that your entry is correct
because /etc/mime.types has

  image/x-ms-bmp                                  bmp

Are you sure that you are using the right mimetype definition.  And are
you also sure that the way you are using this really works?  I doubt
that mime-support is seeking /etc/gnumed - so you would have to register
this type anyway properly (or is there some other mechanism)?

> There is one example right in the file.

In how far is bmp GNUmed typical?

Kind regards


Klarmachen zum Ă„ndern!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]