[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 21:13:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:08:36PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > dem.lnk_identity2primary_doc
> >
> > in v15 now obsoleted by
> >
> > dem.identity.fk_primary_provider
>
> It should, at any rate. Thanks for pointing that out.
Fixed.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04