[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Grub2 svn2059

From: step21
Subject: Re: Grub2 svn2059
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:39:52 +0200

yes, it probably should. i know that when creating an efi image for an
efi based system with grub-mkimage you specify the modules, so it gets
specified there, on a bios system I'm not sure. I don't think a
symlink is the right solution.Did you run after updating?
What might also work is to re-check out grub to a seperate directory,
and try if that works.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:19 PM, BandiPat <address@hidden> wrote:
> step21 wrote:
>> Hey, just a wild guess, but I think boot.mod got dropped and the boot
>> command is now included in minicmd.mod
>> So maybe your build script needs to be adjusted for that, to copy that
>> one to the right place? Not familiar with grub2 booting on i386/bios
>> though anymore, so just a guess.
> ------------
> This could be a very good guess on your part!  Looking at the 2031 build, I
> see the boot.mod, but do not see that in the 2059 build.  So how should this
> be handled in the build?  Add a symlink to minicmd.mod with a boot.mod or
> something else.  Shouldn't the new Grub2 know to look at minicmd.mod instead
> of boot.mod?
> I'll try with the symlink to test your theory, but this seems like a bug to
> me, if that is the case?
> ...still testing
> Pat
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]