[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions
|
From: |
Daniel Krueger |
|
Subject: |
Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:14:26 +0200 |
Hey,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Why not specify the logic in scheme and output it either to C or Assembler
> :-)
That sounds very cool, and would be very cool, I thought first, but
then I realized that you wouldn't be able to bootstrap guile anymore
:-/
- Daniel
- patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/15
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/17
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/17
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/18
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions,
Daniel Krueger <=
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Daniel Krueger, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/06/21
- Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/21