[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL

From: Nala Ginrut
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:13:02 +0800

I sent a mail to the author of (term ansi-color), but seems the
emal-address was invalid.
Well, anyway, to the reason mentioned above, I think it's enough.

New implementation works now, I'll have some tests before release.
Suggestions are welcome ;-)

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 22:42 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> skribis:
>> > Since (term ansi-color) code is small one, except for the comment, do we
>> > still need to ask him for integration? IMO, we just borrowed something
>> > interfaces from his code.
>> Well yes, the color table itself is public data, not even copyrightable
>> per se.
>> > Another question:
>> > I'll try to patch the colorized into 'pretty-print' now, but is it
>> > expected? Or just leave it as a independent module? Which is the proper
>> > way for the maintainer?
>> Instead of patching (ice-9 pretty-print) specifically for your purposes,
>> perhaps you could instead make it more generally extensible, in a way
>> that would be useful for your use case but not only?
> I think (ice-9 colorized) is enough for colored-REPL purpose, of course,
> with Daniel's 'option-REPL-printer' patch. Besides, it'll provide other
> methods of coloring for the users.
> But the opinion to patch to 'pretty-print' also has a reason: if not,
> we'll keep another version of 'list/vector/array' printers. And the
> output indent may be different from 'pretty-print'. Some guys may think
> it's interesting, but others maybe not.
> hmm...
>> (I first need to look at the other threads on this topic...)
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]