[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SGE-Pygame mysteriously downgraded on PyPI

From: Kei Kebreau
Subject: Re: SGE-Pygame mysteriously downgraded on PyPI
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:07:07 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hello,
> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> skribis:
>> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> Hi!
>>> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>> I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but it seems that our
>>>> sge-pygame package is failing to build because the package version on
>>>> PyPI has downgraded from 1.5.1 to 1.5.
>>> How can that downgrade lead to a build failure of our package though?
>> Our sge-pygame definition uses the source code from PyPI, not from GNU
>> Savannah and its mirrors where the project seems to be hosted. Because 
>> version
>> 1.5.1 is no longer available from PyPI servers, our package fails to
>> build.
>> I can change the definition to get the tarball from Savannah and its
>> mirrors because we already do that for python-xsge, a similar package by
>> the same developer.
> Ah, got it.
> Well, I suggest you should do whichever looks most sensible to you.  If
> the downgrade on PyPI was motivated, but we should probably follow
> suite.  Otherwise, we could simply use the 1.5.1 tarball from Savannah.
> Thoughts?
> Ludo’.

For any who may be following this thread, I've elected to use the 1.5.1
tarball from Savannah. The code change is in commit

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]